Summary

Unless we radically decarbonise our transport system, we cannot build a just post-carbon society. But rapid decarbonisation won't be achieved without re-imagining how we move and connect. The future will be different.

This report sets out the contours of an alternative vision for transport: public focused, multi-modal, and zero carbon. It sets out how London could become a private car free-zone by 2030 and the multiple benefits that would generate, alongside a strategy for rapidly improving connectivity, affordability, and quality of low carbon travel across the rest of the UK, including new powers and funding to deliver a better, net-zero transport system.

This release is included in a series on infrastructure, as part of Common Wealth's Green New Deal project.

Key Points

What’s a Rich Text element?

The rich text element allows you to create and format headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, images, and video all in one place instead of having to add and format them individually. Just double-click and easily create content.

Static and dynamic content editing

A rich text element can be used with static or dynamic content. For static content, just drop it into any page and begin editing. For dynamic content, add a rich text field to any collection and then connect a rich text element to that field in the settings panel. Voila!

How to customize formatting for each rich text

Headings, paragraphs, blockquotes, figures, images, and figure captions can all be styled after a class is added to the rich text element using the "When inside of" nested selector system.

"Things all got too much for author Kudno Mojesic. He was arrested in the street outside his Belgrade home attacking cars with an axe, yelling 'Away with all cars, they are the devil's work!'"[1]
Sunday Mirror, London, 11 January 1976

The privatisation of public transport in the UK has had widespread negative impacts on human welfare and social justice. But these are dwarfed by what may prove to have been the most profoundly damaging privatisation project of all time: the relentless subjugation of the public realm to the exigencies of the private motor car. Four out of five journeys in Britain are now made by car, van or taxi[2], and there are 39.4 million licensed vehicles on the UK’s roads – more than one car for every two human beings in the country.[3] The number of cars in the UK has grown in every year since the end of the Second World War,[4] alongside a continual increase in the distance travelled by car.[5]

 

Consequently, transport is now the UK’s largest sectoral source of carbon emissions, accounting for a full third of our total carbon output.[6] It is the only sector to have made no meaningful contribution to emission reductions to date.[7] Almost two thirds of road transport emissions are from cars.[8] Breathing motor traffic pollution leads to the premature deaths of around 8,400 people every year in the UK,[9] and causes one in five childhood asthma cases.[10] Electric vehicles (EVs) are now being promoted by the motoring lobby and the Conservative government as the solution to both the air quality crisis and to decarbonising transport. Two per cent of all new vehicles sold in the UK in 2018 were EVs, most of which were petrol hybrids[11]. Vehicle stock and flow analysis shows that from the point at which 100% of new vehicles sold are EVs, natural market turnover will take 20 years for EVs to make up 90% of the cars in service[12]. Electrification of transport is a wonderful thing. The problem is the cars[13].

 

Manufacturing a battery powered electric passenger car emits 6-16 tonnes of CO2e[14].  As one and a half metric tonnes of metal, plastic and glass,[15] carrying an average human payload of little more than 100kg,[16] privately owned cars are in use for just 4% of the time, spending the other 96% of their time parked.[17] Each car parked on the street turns 12 square metres of the public realm private.

 

To get onto an emissions pathway consistent with our commitments under the Paris Agreement, it is estimated that the UK will need to see a reduction in overall traffic volumes of between 20% and 60% by 2030, depending on how fast we can switch to EVs.[18] That is a lot of traffic to lose. Yet the DfT’s Road to Zero strategy for decarbonising transport contains no measures to reduce traffic growth.[19] Instead, the government projects that traffic will increase by up to 50% by 2050,[20] and plans to spend £30bn of public money between 2020–2025 on road-building to facilitate this.[21] Car traffic is known to expand to fill whatever space is given to it[22]; the DfT’s own assessments show that these schemes ultimately worsen traffic jams, rather than alleviating them.[23]

 

Reductions in traffic volume of the magnitude demanded by the rapid decarbonisation horizon appear, on the face of it, to be a major headache for politicians. But a shift away from car travel is also the single low-carbon measure with the greatest socio-economic co-benefits[24]. Done right, this will change people’s lives for the better in a very material way. The imperative to abandon our cars is a golden opportunity to reclaim some of the most important parts of the public realm for people.

 

Almost half of low income households have no access to a car[25], while those in the wealthiest households travel more than twice as far by car each year.[26] Arranging our geography for the convenience of the motorist inscribes a structural bias against the poor into the landscape itself, and locks households into car dependency[27] at the macro level whether they can afford it or not.[28] Car dominance is so debilitating that lack of access to a car in Western society is a key measure of social deprivation.[29] Cars isolate and atomise society, cutting us off from one another inside armoured shells that protect those inside by endangering everyone else. Falling child road fatality figures are mirrored by growing childhood obesity and depression,[30] as children grow up in confinement because motor traffic has made the streets unsafe.[31]

 

The best place to start the search for steep reductions in motor traffic is obvious: cities. The automobile has profoundly transfigured the face of the British landscape and built environment over the past 70 years. Suburban sprawl, out of town shopping centres and commuter satellite towns with no railway stations all conspire to a reliance on private cars for basic mobility. But many UK city road layouts predate the automobile by hundreds of years. They were never designed to accommodate motor traffic, yet we have funneled unimaginable numbers of private cars into these cramped urban spaces, to the detriment of all concerned – including those behind the wheel.

 

In the metropolis, the promise of private car ownership is frustrated: speed and control, freedom and convenience – all as illusory as the open road in the advert. Take London. There are 6.8 million trips by private car in London every day. Some estimates suggest that on average eight minutes of each trip is spent looking for a parking place,[32] even though over 50 square kilometres of London’s public realm – some of the most contested and expensive space in the entire world[33] – is given over to car parking.[34] Despite cars that are capable of over 120mph, London’s drivers travel at an average speed of 7mph and waste 227 hours a year stuck in traffic.[35] Air quality inside a car stuck in traffic is 140% worse than it is outside.[36]

 

Meanwhile children at 400 schools in the capital are breathing illegally toxic air, preventing their lungs from developing normally,[37] and a child is hospitalised by traffic pollution-induced asthma every day.[38] Eighty-three people were violently killed by motor vehicles while walking or cycling on London’s streets in 2017.[39] The motor vehicle is like a cuckoo in the nest of the urban environment; it cannot share the space without murdering its companions.

 

Yet London is also the only region of the UK with a long term trend of declining traffic. There are two underlying reasons for this. First, London receives far higher per capita spending on transport infrastructure than any other region.[40] Second, London’s public transport system remains under democratic ownership and control via its transport authority, Transport for London (TfL).

 

When bus services were deregulated in the rest of England in the 1980s, London was unique in retaining its ability to strategically plan and manage bus routes and fares, deciding when, where and how frequently to run the services.[41] Since then, bus use in the capital has risen by 52% while it has declined in other English cities by 40%.[42] TfL mandates that a single bus fare in London today costs £1.50. In Manchester, there are 47 competing private bus companies, and a single fare in some of the most disadvantaged areas can cost £4.40[43]; the Scottish Parliament has recently voted to allow local authorities to run their own bus services.[44]

 

Since TfL took control of the Overground from private operators in 2007, passenger numbers have increased by five times.[45] Over the same period, tube, DLR and cycling journeys all rose sharply, while driving fell.[46] Londoners now make 40% fewer trips by car than those living in other cities in England[47] and car ownership levels are the lowest in Britain.[48] London is consistently ranked in the top ten cities worldwide for high quality public transport.[49] The most publicly owned and heavily planned transport economy in the UK is also by far the most successful.

 

Despite all this, London is still the most congested city in the UK,[50] and one of the most polluted.[51] It is not possible to optimise this high pressure system while working around the coagulating presence of huge numbers of private cars. Most Londoners won’t dare cycle because of a legitimate fear of being killed or maimed by a motor vehicle,[52] while bus journey times in London are increasing remorselessly because the buses are stuck in car traffic.[53] Leaving the bulk of urban transport arrangements to the invisible hand of the market in a crowded world that is designed around the automobile is a recipe for carnage and gridlock. Half measures that nibble away at the edges of traffic’s dominion are no good. The city must eliminate the private car from the public realm altogether.

 

It’s hard to imagine, so let’s try a thought experiment. It is 2030. Privately-owned cars have disappeared from Greater London. As you leave work to go and meet a friend across town, you open the TfL app on your phone. The app shows every journey option available, including time and price.

Toggle Full Article

Walk

You could take a stroll on the strategic walking network that now spans the whole of the city, connecting up London’s town centres via its green spaces, with wide pavements lined with trees and benches and water fountains. Shops and cafes bustle with customers.[54] Along these walking routes, pedestrians have right of way; wherever they are crossed by roads and tracks, the lights default to green for pedestrians, and other transport modes must wait for them to change.[55]

Bus

 

These days nearly all Londoners live within 200m of a bus stop with a regular scheduled service. All buses are electric; the diesel buses have been cascaded out to the countryside to reopen rural routes. With the cars gone, congestion has been almost completely eradicated, halving bus journey times in the busiest parts of town.[56] Bus routes are owned and operated by local municipal bus companies and TfL directly, and all buses in the city are free for those who live there.

 

Tram and Tube

 

Without cars, so much space has been freed up on London’s strategic road network - also managed by TfL – that tram lanes now run down every major road, and are often the fastest way to cross town where there’s no good tube route. Tram and tube tickets both cost a little but it’s worth it for the speed. Like the tube, the tram system is owned and operated by TfL. From 7pm to 7am, the tram network is shared with bi-mode electric HGVs carrying pantographs that allow them to tap into the overhead power to make large scale deliveries.[57]

 

Cycle

 

Dockless bikes are now ubiquitous, booked and unlocked with the TfL app. TfL planners ensure minimum comprehensive coverage across the city, and cycle hire is free to annual subscribers, pensioners and under 18s. Segregated cycle lanes are everywhere, even down to quiet residential streets, which are no longer crowded with parked cars.

 

E-bike

 

You could cruise to your destination at an even 15mph without breaking a sweat, on a London e-bike designed, built and maintained by a workers cooperative here in the capital. Members pay an annual subscription to ride free, while non members pay a small hire fee.

 

E-scooter

 

You’re a member of London’s independent e-scooter coop as you love how fun they are, and how frictionless it is to stop and start on one. Scooter journeys have a tiny environmental footprint,[58] plus they don’t mess with your outfit.

 

Car-share

 

There are still a few cars on London’s roads in 2030, though they’re all electric. Most streets have a charging bay or two for the car share scheme, run by a coop that is regulated by TfL to manage overall numbers.

 

Taxis and Private Hire Vehicles

 

There’s still plenty of appetite for private, door to door ride-hailing services amongst wealthier Londoners, so no taxi or minicab drivers lost their jobs in the transition. Instead, the number of licensed hire drivers more than doubled when private cars were expunged from the city. Without traffic congestion, all car trips are much faster than they used to be, so drivers are able to turn jobs around quicker and earn more too.

 

The experience for service users works just like Uber, but drivers and riders are members of a regulated platform cooperative that pays sick pay, pensions and annual leave. The ride-hailing platform is far more efficiently run by TfL as a monopoly service with blanket coverage of the entire capital, while the cab cooperative, with the help of City Hall, provides access to low cost finance for driver members to choose and operate their own electric vehicles. Dynamic road user pricing[59] makes private car travel an expensive way to get around during rush hour, helping to keep streets moving freely 24/7.

 

Ride-sharing

 

You could summon an on-demand minibus – one of the purpose built red eight-seater, wheelchair accessible ride-shares that operate like a bespoke shuttle service, and have become the most popular option for door to door travel amongst Londoners. They’re not quite as fast or direct as a completely private journey, but they’re a lot more affordable – and they’re free to the 3% of Londoners with a blue badge.

 

Auto-rickshaw

 

More expensive than the tube or tram, but far cheaper than a private car ride, journeys by electric three wheelers are also four times more energy efficient.[60] The locally-built black London taxi-styled e-rickshaws have picked up a sizeable share of the journeys formerly made by car. Unlike a ride in a petrol tuk-tuk, an e-rickshaw journey is almost silent.

 

School bus

 

In the outer London boroughs, free, dedicated school buses are returning from their daily drop offs in the suburbs,[61] where urban sprawl has made it a little harder to meet mobility needs without private cars.[62] Digital route planning means it is simple for these local authority run services to deliver bespoke, responsive routes based on need.[63]

 

Vans

 

Most of the other vehicles on London’s roads are electric light goods vehicles (LGVs). Although nearly three quarters of the deliveries that used to be made by van were small and light enough to now made by e-cargo bike,[64] vans are still needed for tens of thousands of tradespeople, services and utilities going about their business every day.[65]

 

The disappearance of congestion[66] has made life less stressful for London’s professional drivers, and radically improved productivity for businesses and public utilities that rely on LGVs – helping to contribute to moves to a shorter working week. Overall, London’s economy is billions of pounds better off each year now it is free from private car traffic,[67] and the biggest direct beneficiaries are the taxi drivers and van-based businesses who had historically been amongst the biggest barriers to measures to control traffic. Much safer streets means there are far fewer road casualties, and ambulance response times have shrunk by precious, life-saving minutes too.[68] Parks and allotments grow where car parks once stood, and local shops and new homes have taken over the sites of former petrol stations.


Rapid build out of the walking and cycling networks and free, ubiquitous bus transport were the early measures that unlocked the city’s successful transition away from car domination. An e-bike swapage scheme helped many households give up their cars too.[69] Reclaiming parking spaces for more beneficial uses was hard at first but began to gain popularity as people saw the results. Most of the cars that had been choking the streets of places like Hackney and Tower Hamlets belonged to people from outside the area.

 

Bringing all private hire vehicles city-wide under the same unified platform allowed TfL to begin to consolidate all transport modes into a single, incredibly powerful app, dramatically streamlining all journey planning. This in turn gave TfL near-total visibility over movements in the capital, allowing strategic planning to deliver seamless journeys integrating all transport modes. Planning efficient journeys for millions of people every day is not easy, but incomplete information is the least of our worries in the age of big data and machine learning.[70] In the 21st century, the more carefully planned an urban transport system is, the better it works for everyone using it.[71]

 

As the TfL model is rolled out to every metropolitan region, alongside extra powers over local taxation and revenue raising, direct control over commuter rail into cities, and boosted borrowing and negotiating authority,[72] private car ownership is fast becoming obsolete in the UK’s cities. Democratic control via Mayors means these bodies can also integrate transport planning with other public interest goals around housing, health, education, crime and economic development. Led by municipalities, the modal shift to new forms of urban transit is being driven through procurement and commissioning rules that privilege local businesses, democratic ownership models and social enterprise. In 2030 over nine out of ten of us are living in cities[73]. So removing private cars from cities means actually owning a car has become, quite suddenly, a niche pursuit – profoundly changing the shape of mobility nationwide.

 

This rapid and fundamental re-engineering simply mirrors the process by which British society was systematically motorised in the 50s and 60s, when the government forced the closure of thousands of miles of railway lines while constructing a thousand miles of new motorways. Deliberate choices by governments gave us the transport system we have, and they can give us the transport system we need to prosper in the 21st century too. But first we need the courage to imagine better – and then to demand it.


See footnotes

[1] Dave Holloway, Away With All Cars; a prescient and insightful anti-car polemic written by anarchist poet Mr Social Control, aka Dave Holloway, 1994, https://archive.org/details/AwayWithAllCars

[2] DfT statistics, TSGB0101: Passenger transport by mode from 1952

[3] Department for Transport (DfT), Vehicle Licensing Statistics: Annual 2018, 11 April 2019, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/794736/vehicle-licensing-statistics-2018.pdf

[4] Except 1991.  DfT, Vehicle Licensing Statistics, Q4 2014, 9 April 2015  https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/421337/vls-2014.pdf

[5] GOV.UK, Transport Statistics Great Britain, Roads and traffic (TSGB07), Table TSGB0702 (TRA0201) Road traffic (vehicle kilometres) by vehicle type in Great Britain, annual from 1949 https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/tsgb07

[6] Department for Business, Energy and industrial Strategy (BEIS), 2018 UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Provisional figures, 28 March 2019, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/790626/2018-provisional-emissions-statistics-report.pdf

[7] BEIS statistics, Final UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions National Statistics 1190-2017, 28 March 2019, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/789811/Final_greenhouse_gas_emissions_tables_2017.xlsx

[8] DfT Statistics, ENV0202, 2018: Carbon dioxide emissions by transport mode: United Kingdom

[9] Susan Anenberg et al, “A Global Snapshot of the Air Pollution-Related Health Impacts of Transportation Sector Emissions in 2010 and 2015”, International Council on Clean Transportation, 2019,  https://www.theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/Global_health_impacts_transport_emissions_2010-2015_20190226.pdf

[10] Pattanun Achakulwisut, Prof Michael Brauer, Perry Hystad and Susan C Anenberg (2019),

“Global, national, and urban burdens of paediatric asthma incidence attributable to ambient NO2 pollution: estimates from global datasets”, The Lancet, Planetary Health, 3 (4), PE166-E178, (2019),

 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpla/article/PIIS2542-5196(19)30046-4/fulltext

[11] DfT (2018)

[12]David R Keith, Samantha Houston and Sergey Naumov, “Vehicle fleet turnover and the future of fuel economy”, Environmental Research Letters, 14 (2), 15 February 2019,  https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf4d2

[13] Lisa Hopkinson and Lynn Sloman (2019), More than electric cars: why we need to reduce traffic to reach carbon targets, Transport for Quality of Life http://www.transportforqualityoflife.com/u/files/190209_More_than_electric_cars.pdf

[14] Jane Patterson, “Understanding the lifecycle GHG emissions for different vehicles types and powertrain technologies”, Ricardo AE & Low Carbon Vehicles Partnership, 2018 https://www.lowcvp.org.uk/assets/reports/LowCVP-LCA_Study-Final_Report.pdf

[15] 1.4 tonnes was the UK average private car weight in 2016. EVs tend to be 20-30% heavier. Pocketbook 2017/18, “European Vehicle Market Statistics”, International Council on Clean Transportation https://www.theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT_Pocketbook_2017_Web.pdf

[16] Average occupancy for car journeys in the UK is 1.55, average adult weight is 75kg. National Travel Survey, Table NTS0905, "Car / van occupancy and lone driver rate by trip purpose: England, 2002-2017”

[17] John Bates & David Leibling, Spaced Out: perspectives on parking policy, RAC Foundation 2012, https://www.racfoundation.org/assets/rac_foundation/content/downloadables/spaced_out-bates_leibling-jul12.pdf

[18] Hopkinson and Sloman (2019)

[19] gov.uk, “The Road to Zero Next steps towards cleaner road transport and delivering our Industrial Strategy”, July 2018, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reducing-emissions-from-road-transport-road-to-zero-strategy

[20] DfT Road Traffic Forecasts 2018 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/740399/road-traffic-forecasts-2018.pdf

[21] GOV.UK, Budget 2018 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/budget-2018-24-things-you-need-to-know

[22] Benjamin Schneider, “CityLab University: Induced Demand”, 6 September 2018,  https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2018/09/citylab-university-induced-demand/569455/

[23] E.g. Highways England, “National Pinch Point Programme - One Year After Evaluation Meta Analysis “, January 2019 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/791450/National_PP_Programme_Meta_Final_draft.pdf

[24] Committee on Climate Change, “The Fourth Carbon Budget Review - part 2: the cost effective path to the 2050 target”, 2019

[25] National Travel Survey, NTS0703, “Household car availability by household income quintile: England, 2014”,

[26] National Travel Survey, NTS0705, “Distance travelled by car by level of household income, England 2014”

[27] Giulio Mattioli, Jillian Anable and Katerina Vrotsou, Transportation Research, Part A 89 (2016) 56-72 Car dependent practices: Findings from a sequence pattern mining study of UK time use data, Institute for Transport Studies, Leeds University, 18 May 2016 http://www.demand.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Mattioli-Anable-Car-dependent.pdf

[28] Foundation for Integrated Transport, Transport for New Homes, “Policy summary and recommendations”, July 2018 http://www.transportfornewhomes.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/transport-for-new-homes-summary-web.pdf

[29] David Gordon, et al, “The new EU indicator of material and social deprivation”, Annex 1 to SPC/ISG/2017/5/4, 2017,  https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=19228&langId=en\

[30] DfT “Reported Road Casualties Great Britain 2017: Annual Report”, statistics, Table RAS30062 Reported children (aged 0-15) killed or seriously injured by road user type, Great Britain 1979 - 2017, September 2018 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/755698/rrcgb-2017.pdf

[31] Shaw et al, “Children’s Independent Mobility: an international comparison and recommendations for action”, Policy Studies Institute, July 2015 http://www.psi.org.uk/docs/7350_PSI_Report_CIM_final.pdf

[32] britishparking.co.uk, accessed June 2019, YouGov (2016) British Parking Association https://www.britishparking.co.uk/News/motorists-spend-nearly-four-days-a-year-looking-for-a-parking-space

[33] worldatlas.com, accessed June 2019,  https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-most-expensive-cities-in-the-world-for-real-estate.html

[34] Author’s own calculation, based on TfL (2005) Update to London Parking Supply Study https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/237867/response/590420/attach/3/finalreport12%2007%2005.pdf

[35] inrix.com, accessed June 2019, Reed, T & Kidd, J, Global Traffic Scorecard, INRIX Research

http://inrix.com/scorecard/

[36] rac.co.uk, accessed June 2019, https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/news/motoring-news/in-car-pollution-equivalent-to-passively-smoking/

[37] Williamson, Tim et al, “Air Pollution Exposure in London: Impact of the London Environment Strategy”, January 2019,  https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/les_exposure_rpt_final2-rb.pdf

[38] Heather Walton et al, “Health Impact Assessment Of Air Pollution On Asthma In London”, April 2019,

 http://www.erg.kcl.ac.uk/Research/home/projects/air-pollution-and-asthma-admissions-in-London.html

[39] tfl.gov.uk, accessed June 2019, “Travel in London Report 11”, Transport for London, 2018, http://content.tfl.gov.uk/travel-in-london-report-11.pdf

[40] Tom Rutherford, “Briefing Paper: Transport Spending by Region,” House of Commons Library, 16 February 2018, https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8130#fullreport

[41]  Nicole Badstuber, citymetric.com, accessed June 2019 https://www.citymetric.com/transport/over-last-quarter-century-bus-use-52-cent-london-and-down-40-cent-other-british-cities

[42] KPMG, “Local Bus Market Study”, January 2016, Bus Statistics Table BUS0103

Passenger journeys on local bus services by metropolitan area status and country: Great Britain, annual from 1970 https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/01/local-bus-market-study-access.pdf

[43] Helen Pidd, “‘Massively unfair gulf in bus fares between London and the rest of England’” , the Guardian, 5 May 2019, https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/may/05/bus-fares-reveal-massively-unfair-gulf-between-london-and-rest-of-england

[44] Sean Bell, “A great step forward’: Campaigners welcome move to let councils set up bus services”, common space.com, accessed June 2019,

https://www.commonspace.scot/articles/14352/great-step-forward-campaigners-welcome-move-let-councils-set-bus-services

[45] tfl.gov.uk, accessed June 2019, “Public Transport Journeys by Type of Transport”, https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/public-transport-journeys-type-transport

[46] tfl.gov.uk, accessed June 2018, “Transport in London 11", Table 2.2 Aggregate travel volumes in Greater London. Estimated daily average number of journey stages by mode, 1997-2017. Seven-day week.

[47] Department for Transport statistics, National Travel Survey, Table NTS9903, 2017,

Average number of trips (trip rates) by main mode, region and Rural-Urban Classification: England

[48] racfoundation.org, accessed June 2019, RAC Foundation, “Car ownership rates by local authority” 2012, https://www.racfoundation.org/assets/rac_foundation/content/downloadables/car%20ownership%20rates%20by%20local%20authority%20-%20december%202012.pdf

[49] Arcadis, Citizen Centric Cities, “Global Sustainable Cities Index 2018”, 2018 https://www.arcadis.com/en/global/our-perspectives/sustainable-cities-index-2018/citizen-centric-cities/

[50] Inrix (accessed June 2019)

[51] who.int, accessed June 2019, World Health Organisation, “WHO Global Ambient Air Quality Database”, update 2018, https://www.who.int/airpollution/data/cities/en/

[52] TfL Future Thinking Report 1986 “Attitudes to cycling” September 2016 http://content.tfl.gov.uk/attitudes-to-cycling-2016.pdf

[53] David Begg, “The Impact of Congestion on Bus Passengers”, Greener Journeys, 2016  https://greenerjourneys.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/TTBusReport_Digital.pdf

[54] TfL .gov.uk, accessed June 2019,  "Walking and cycling: the economic benefits” 2018 http://content.tfl.gov.uk/walking-cycling-economic-benefits-summary-pack.pdf

[55] TfL (2018)

[56] Begg (2016)

[57] ehighway-sh.de, accessed June 2019, “Germany is currently trialling an electric autobahn for e-HGVs” https://www.ehighway-sh.de/de/ehighway.html

[58] chesterenergyandpolicy.com, accessed June 2019, “Shared e-scooter journeys have 1-3% of the emissions per mile travelled compared to a car”, 11 June 2018,

https://chesterenergyandpolicy.com/2018/06/11/the-electric-scooter-fallacy-just-because-theyre-electric-doesnt-mean-theyre-green/

[59] Association for Consultancy and Engineering, “Funding roads for the future“ , January 2018,  https://www.acenet.co.uk/media/1139/funding-roads-for-the-future.pdf

[60] Integrated Energy Agency, “The Future of Rail”, 30 January 2019, https://www.iea.org/futureofrail/

[61] Will Norman, @willnorman, “250,000 car journeys in London every day are for the school run” https://twitter.com/willnorman/status/1110233803178602496?s=21

[62] Sian Thornthwaite, “Campaign for Better Transport, “School transport matters”, March 2016, https://bettertransport.org.uk/sites/default/files/research-files/16.05.25.school-transport-matters.pdf

[63] Nicole Kobie, wired,co.uk, “The rules refuse to bend as Citymapper moves to disrupt London transport”, 22 February 2018, https://www.wired.co.uk/article/citymapper-smart-ride-ceo-smart-bus-make-money

[64] Clare Dowdy, furnacemag.com, accessed June 2019, “Delivering the Future?”, German workers coop ZEG offers a template for UK e-cargo bike provision https://furnacemag.com/ecargobikes-last-mile-deliveries/

Alex Bowden, road.cc, accessed June 2019, “70% of deliveries currently made by van could be done with e-cargo bikes" https://road.cc/content/news/257467-mayor-and-tfl-announce-plans-encourage-more-last-mile-deliveries-cargo-bike

[65] Clarke, Johnson, Nankivell and Turpin AECOM “Van travel trends in Great Britain”, April 2014

[66] tfl.gov.uk, “Understanding and managing congestion”, Three quarters of congestion in London is caused by excess traffic.,GLA November 2017, Residential Car Parking https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/london_plan_evidence_base_-_residential_car_parking.pdf#page27

[67] Inrix (2019)

[68] Archie Drake et al, Policy Institute at King’s, “Data for Ambulance Despatch”, May 2018, https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/data-for-ambulance-dispatch.pdf

[69] como.org.uk, accessed June 2019, “Bike Share Users Survey” 2018  https://como.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/CoMoUK-Bike-Share-Survey-2018-WEB.pdf

[70] intelligenttransport.com (accessed June 2019), “How TfL uses ‘big data’ to plan transport services” https://www.intelligenttransport.com/transport-articles/19635/tfl-big-data-transport-services/

[71] Johnny Ball, “Municipal bus companies: can public ownership be profitable?” New Statesman, 13 June 2018, https://www.newstatesman.com/spotlight/transport/2018/06/municipal-bus-companies-can-public-ownership-be-profitable

[72] Zach Wilcox, Nada Nohrovà & Elliot Bidgood, "Delivering change: Making transport work for cities," Centre for Cities, May 2014, https://www.centreforcities.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/14-05-01-Delivering-change-Making-transport-work-for-cities.pdf

[73] the guardian.com, (accessed June 2019), https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2009/aug/18/percentage-population-living-cities


More of our latest reports:

Sign up to our mailing list

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.